Ground Effect on Aerodynamic Characteristics of Flapping-Wing Micro Air Vehicles

Anh-Tuan Nguyen1, , Thanh-Trung Vu1, Thanh-Dong Pham1, Cong-Truong Dinh2
1 Le Quy Don Technical University - No. 236, Hoang Quoc Viet Street, Bac Tu Liem District, Ha Noi, Viet Nam
2 Hanoi University of Science and Technology - No. 1, Dai Co Viet, Hai Ba Trung, Ha Noi, Viet Nam

Main Article Content

Abstract

This paper presents the ground effect on the aerodynamic performance of a hawkmoth-like flapping-wing micro air vehicle. An unsteady aerodynamic model based on the potential-flow theory is used to determine the ground effect at several flight conditions. In this research, the program is written in FORTRAN programming language by using OpenMP library for parallel computing. It was found that the ground effect is the most significant when the flapping-wing micro air vehicle is hovering with a reduction in the lift force when the distance from the center of mass of the flapping-wing micro air vehicle to the ground is below 0.05 m. For forward flight, this effect tends to decrease as the flight speed increases.

Article Details

References

[1] C. P. Ellington, Aerodynamics and the origin of insect flight. Advances in Insect Physiology, 23 (1991), pp. 171–210.
[2] H. Liu, S. Ravi, D. Kolomenskiy, H. Tanaka, Biomechanics and Biomimetics in Insect-Inspired Flight Systems. Philosophical Transactions B, 371 (1704) (2016), p. 20150390.
[3] H. Aono, W. Shyy, H. Liu, Near Wake Vortex Dynamics of a Hovering Hawkmoth. Acta Mechanica Sinica, 25 (1) (2009), pp. 23–36.
[4] X. Zhang, K. B. Lua, R. Chang, T. T. Lim, K. S. Yeo, Experimental Study of Ground Effect on Three-Dimensional Insect-Like Flapping Motion. In 5th International Symposium on Physics of Fluids (2014), p. 1460384.
[5] J. Katz, A. Plotkin, Low-Speed Aerodynamics: From Wing Theory to Panel Methods, Cambridge University Press, New York (2001).
[6] A. P. Willmott, C. P. Ellington, The mechanics of flight in the hawkmoth Manduca sexta. I. Kinematics of hovering and forward flight. Journal of Experimental Biology, 200 (21) (1997), pp. 2705–2722.