Comparative Study on the Impact of Carding and Blowroom Cotton Waste on Yarn Properties
Main Article Content
Abstract
This study investigates the impact of blending different types of cotton waste - carding waste and blowroom waste - into Ne16 yarns, using both ring (SNC) and rotor (SOE) spinning methods. Blending ratios of 10% and 20% were applied to evaluate their influence on yarn quality indicators, including thick places (+50%/km), thin places (−50%/km), neps (+200%/km), and hairiness. The results show that increasing the proportion of cotton waste significantly affects yarn evenness. For SNC yarns, blending with carding waste at 10% and 20% led to increases in thick places by 17.2% and 37.9%, while blowroom waste increased thick places by 5.9 and 8.1 times, respectively. A similar trend was observed for thin places and neps, with blowroom waste having a much more pronounced negative effect than carding waste. The hairiness of SNC yarns also increased slightly with higher blending ratios, with blowroom waste contributing to greater hairiness than carding waste. In contrast, SOE yarns demonstrated better resistance to the negative effects of waste blending. For all indicators, SOE yarns exhibited significantly lower increases in defects compared to SNC yarns. For instance, the number of thick places in SOE yarns with 10% and 20% carding waste was only 20.5% and 23.3% of those in SNC yarns, respectively. Blowroom waste tends to deteriorate yarn properties more severely than carding waste, and rotor spinning (SOE) offers better tolerance to recycled material blending than ring spinning (SNC).
Keywords
Cotton waste, carding waste, blowroom waste, yarn quality, sustainable textiles
Article Details

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
References
[2] Subramanian, K., Sarkar, M. K., Wang, H., Qin, Z. -H., Chopra, S. S., Jin, M., Kumar, V., Chen, C., Tsang, C. -W., and Lin, C. S. K., An overview of cotton and polyester, and their blended waste textile valorisation to value-added products: A circular economy approach - research trends, Opportunities and Challenges, Critical Revieves in Environment Science Technology, vol. 52, iss. 1, pp. 3921–3942, Aug. 2021. https://doi.org/10.1080/10643389.2021.1966254
[3] Merati, A. A., and Okamura, M., Producing medium count yarns from recycled fibers with friction spinning, Textile Research
Journal, vol. 74, iss. 7, pp. 640–645, Jul. 2004. https://doi.org/10.1177/004051750407400715
[4] Halimi, M. T., Hassen, and M. B., and Azzouz, B., Effect of cotton waste and spinning parameters on rotor yarn quality, The Journal of the Textile Institute, vol. 98, iss. 5, pp. 437–442, Sep. 2007. https://doi.org/10.1080/00405000701547649
[5] El-Nouby, G. and Hairiness of Yarns Made of Recycled Waste Fabric, Journal of Applied Sciences Research, vol. 3, iss. 10, pp. 972–976, 2007. https://doi.org/10.3923/pjbs.2007.972.976
[6] Hassani, H., Tabatabaei, S. A., and Semnani, D. Determining the optimum spinning conditions to produce the rotor yarns from cotton wastes, Industria Textila, 2010, vol. 58, pp. 259–264.
[7] Khan, K. R., Hossain, M. M., Chandra, S. R. Statistical analyses and predicting the properties of cotton/waste blended open-end rotor yarn using Taguchi OA design, International Journal of Textile Science, vol. 4, iss. 2, pp. 22–35, 2015.
[8] Taher, H. M., Bechir, A., Mohammed, B. H., and Sakli, F., Influence of spinning parameters and recovered fibers from cotton waste on the uniformity and hairiness of rotor spun yarn, Journal of Engineered Fibers and Fabrics, vol. 4, iss. 3, pp. 36–45, 2009.
https://doi.org/10.1177/155892500900400304
[9] Halimi, M. T., Hassen, M. B., and Sakli, F., Cotton waste recycling: Quantitative and qualitative assessment in Resources, Conversation & Recycling, 2008, vol. 52, iss. 5, pp. 785–791, Mar. 2008. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resconrec.2007.11.009