Assessing Media Multitasking Behavior in Academic Activities of Students at Hanoi University of Science and Technology: A Study Using the Media Multitasking-Revised (MMT-R) Scale
Main Article Content
Abstract
The rapid development of digital technology in modern life has led to the widespread emergence of media multitasking behaviour among university students, especially in high-tech learning environments such as Hanoi University of Science and Technology. This study uses the Media Multitasking-Revised (MMT-R) scale to assess the level of multitasking behaviour in the classroom among 257 students from various academic disciplines. The data were analysed using Exploratory Factor Analysis (EFA) and Confirmatory Factor Analysis (CFA). The theoretical model identifies two core behavioural constructs: Compulsive Phone Checking (CPC) and Media Distraction (MD). The results indicate that students tend to engage in multitasking at a moderate level, with no significant gender differences, suggesting that this behaviour is generational rather than gender specific. Furthermore, the intention to engage in multitasking is strongly associated with CPC - controlled device usage - while MD, which reflects passive and uncontrolled distraction, is no longer a significant predictor and may indicate signs of digital addiction. The findings suggest that the MMT-R scale can be used not only as a behavioural measurement tool but also as a screening and early diagnostic instrument to identify high-risk student groups. Based on this classification, students can be grouped to design appropriate interventions aimed at promoting more mindful use of digital devices in learning environments.
Keywords
Device usage behaviour, media distraction, media multitasking, technology addiction, university students.
Article Details
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
References
[2] R. Hammer, M. Ronen, A. Sharon, T. Lankry, R. Huberman, and V. Zamtsov, Mobile culture in college lectures: Instructors’ and students’ perspectives, Interdisciplinary Journal of e-Learning and Learning Objects, vol. 6, pp. 293–304, 2010. https://doi.org/10.28945/1316
[3] J.-Y. Wu, The indirect relationship of media multitasking self-efficacy on learning performance within the personal learning environment: Implications from the mechanism of perceived attention problems and self-regulation strategies, Computers and Education, vol. 106, pp. 56–72, Mar. 2017.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2016.10.010
[4] Y. Zhou and L. Deng, A systematic review of media multitasking in educational contexts: Trends, gaps, and antecedents, Interactive Learning Environments, vol. 31, no. 10, Jun. 2023. https://doi.org/10.1080/10494820.2022.2032760
[5] R. Junco and S. R. Cotten, No A 4 U: The relationship between multitasking and academic performance, Computers & Education, vol. 59, no. 2, pp. 505–514, Sep. 2012. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2011.12.023
[6] E. Ophir, C. Nass, and A. D. Wagner, Cognitive control in media multitaskers, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, vol. 106, no. 37, pp. 15583–15587, Sep. 2009. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0903620106
[7] T. B. Dao, D. Q. T. Bao, N. T. M. Phuong, N. N. B. Uyen, and P. H. Long, The impact of nomophobia syndrome on students’ sleep quality: The mediating role of anxiety and media multitasking, Journal of Science and Technology – The University of Danang, vol. 23, no. 3, pp. 293–304, 2025. [In Vietnamese]
https://doi.org/10.31130/ud-jst.2025.040
[8] D. Alzahabi and M. W. Becker, The association between media multitasking, task-switching, and dual-task performance, Journal of Cognitive Psychology, vol. 25, no. 3, pp. 357–364, 2013.
[9] A. Lepp, J. E. Barkley, and A. C. Karpinski, The relationship between cell phone use and academic performance in a sample of U.S. college students, SAGE Open, vol. 5, no. 1, Feb. 2015. https://doi.org/10.1177/2158244015573169
[10] W. A. van der Schuur, S. E. Baumgartner, S. R. Sumter, and P. M. Valkenburg, Media multitasking and sleep problems: A longitudinal study among adolescents, Computers in Human Behavior, vol. 81, pp. 316–324, Apr. 2018. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2017.12.024
[11] R. B. Lopez, T. F. Heatherton, and D. D. Wagner, Media multitasking is associated with higher risk for obesity and increased responsiveness to rewarding food stimuli, Brain Imaging and Behavior, vol. 14, pp. 1050–1061, Mar. 2019. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11682-019-00056-0
[12] K. A. Aivaz and D. Teodorescu, College students’ distractions from learning caused by multitasking in online vs. face-to-face classes: A case study at a public university in Romania, International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, vol. 19, no. 18, Art. no. 11188, Sep. 2022. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph191811188
[13] S. Bellur, K. L. Nowak, and K. S. Hull, Make it our time: In-class multitaskers have lower academic performance, Computers in Human Behavior, vol. 53, pp. 63–70, Dec. 2015. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2015.06.027
[14] J. C. Nunnally and I. H. Bernstein, Psychometric Theory, 3rd ed. New York, NY, USA: McGraw-Hill, 1994.
[15] J. Cohen, Statistical Power Analysis for the Behavioral Sciences, 2nd ed. Hillsdale, NJ, USA: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, 1988.
[16] A. Field, Discovering Statistics Using IBM SPSS Statistics, 4th ed. Los Angeles, CA, USA: Sage Publications, 2013.
[17] J. F. Hair, W. C. Black, B. J. Babin, and R. E. Anderson, Multivariate Data Analysis, 7th ed. Upper Saddle River, NJ, USA: Pearson, 2010.
[18] L. Hu and P. M. Bentler, “Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: Conventional criteria versus new alternatives,” Structural Equation Modeling, vol. 6, no. 1, pp. 1–55, 1999.
[19] D. George and P. Mallery, SPSS for Windows Step by Step: A Simple Guide and Reference, 10th ed. Boston, MA, USA: Pearson, 2010.
[20] R. C. MacCallum, K. F. Widaman, S. Zhang, and S. Hong, Sample size in factor analysis, Psychological Methods, vol. 4, no. 1, pp. 84–99, 1999. https://doi.org/10.1037/1082-989X.4.1.84
[21] H. F. Kaiser, An index of factorial simplicity, Psychometrika, vol. 39, no. 1, pp. 31–36, 1974.
https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02291575
[22] R. F. Scherer, D. C. Luther, R. C. Wiebe, and J. S. Adams, Dimensionality of coping: Factor stability using the Ways of Coping Questionnaire, Psychological Reports, vol. 62, no. 3, pp. 763–770, 1988.
[23] M. Blanz, Forschungsmethoden und Statistik für die Soziale Arbeit: Grundlagen und Anwendungen. Stuttgart, Germany: Kohlhammer, 2015. https://doi.org/10.17433/978-3-17-025836-5