Evaluation and Analyzing of Air Drying Distribution in Chamber withTuned Relative Vertical Position of Frames

Nguyen Duc Trung1, , Nguyen Truong Giang1, Nguyen Thi Thao2, Nguyen Trung Hieu3, Nguyen Thi Ngoc Anh2, Le Ngoc Cuong1, Pham Thanh Huong1, Phan Minh Thuy1, Nguyen Ngoc Hoang1
1 School of Chemistry and Life Sciences, Hanoi University of Science and Technology, Ha Noi, Vietnam
2 Green Technology and Digital Transformation Co., Ltd, Ha Noi, Vietnam
3 School of Material Sciences, Hanoi University of Science and Technology, Ha Noi, Vietnam

Main Article Content

Abstract

Drying efficiency strongly depends on the uniformity of airflow distribution within the drying chamber. In the study, two-dimensional Computational Fluid Dynamics (CFD) simulations were employed to analyze airflow behavior in a multi-tray drying chamber with six geometric configurations characterized by different frame steps (S). The results reveal that airflow uniformity decreases with chamber height, with pronounced instabilities observed at the upper frames. The value of S was found to play a critical role in airflow distribution. The most popular design of case I with zero-step (baseline) exhibited the poorest performance, with relative standard deviation (RSD) exceeding 55.6% and the largest inhomogeneity with max to min discrepancy (M2M up to 12.5), indicating strong airflow irregularity. In contrast, case V with the tuned vertical step of frame at 30 mm demonstrated the best performance, with RSD as low as 18.7–28.1% and minimal M2M differences, reflecting highly uniform airflow across the tray surfaces. The bigger absolute value of step gave better performance than the smaller ones because the drying airflow tends to follow the surface of trays. Compared to previous studies, these findings underscore the importance of evaluating airflow directly at the tray surfaces rather than solely at the chamber scale. Overall, the study offers practical guidance for optimizing tray arrangement and frame step design to improve airflow uniformity, thereby enhancing drying performance and product quality.

Article Details

References

[1] Á. Calín-Sánchez, L. Lipan, M. Cano-Lamadrid, A. Kharaghani, K. Masztalerz, Á. A. Carbonell-Barrachina, and A. Figiel, Comparison of traditional and novel drying techniques and its effect on quality of fruits, vegetables and aromatic herbs, Foods, vol. 9, iss. 9, Sep. 2020, Art. no. 1261.https://doi.org/10.3390/foods9091261
[2] P. Schinabeck, M. Pfannemüller, S. Schlüter, and H. Kulozik, Effect of moisture distribution on the quality and storage stability of dried food products, Journal of Food Engineering, vol. 243, pp. 63–71, Sep. 2019.
[3] S. Misha, S. Mat, M. A. M. Rosli, M. H. Ruslan, K. Sopian, and E. Salleh, Simulation of air flow distribution in a tray dryer by CFD, Applied Mechanics and Materials, vol. 699, pp. 887–892, Apr. 2015.
[4] F. U. Rehman, L. Huang, E. Anderlini, and G. Thomas, Hydrodynamic modelling for a transportation system of two unmanned underwater vehicles: Semi-empirical, numerical and experimental analyses, Journal of Marine Science and Engineering, vol. 9, iss. 5, May 2021, Art. no. 500.
https://doi.org/10.3390/jmse9050500
[5] S. Misha, S. Mat, M. J. Ruslan, K. Sopian, and E. Salleh, The CFD simulation of tray dryer design for kenaf core drying, Applied Mechanics and Materials, vol. 393, pp. 717–722, Sep. 2013. https://doi.org/10.4028/www.scientific.net/AMM.393.717
[6] A. Hassan, A CFD integrated drying model for improving drying conditions in industry-scale dryers, Thermal Science and Engineering Progress, vol. 61, May 2025, Art. no. 103533. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tsep.2025.103533
[7] D. Cebulski and P. Cyklis, Application of CFD simulation to the design of an innovative drying chamber, Energies, vol. 17, iss. 13, Jul. 2024, Art. no. 3338. https://doi.org/10.3390/en17133338
[8] N. Therdthai, W. Zhou, and T. Adamczak, Two-dimensional CFD modelling and simulation of an industrial continuous bread baking oven, Journal of Food Engineering, vol. 60, iss. 2, pp. 211–217, Nov. 2003. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0260-8774(03)00043-8
[9] M. A. R. Kavindi, K. S. P. Amaratunga, E. M. A. C. Ekanayake, A. J. Fernando, and A. M. S. K. Abesinghe, CFD simulation of airflow distribution in a heat pump-assisted deep-bed paddy dryer, Applied Engineering in Agriculture, vol. 38, no. 1, pp. 1–8, 2022.
https://doi.org/10.13031/aea.14483
[10] ANSYS Inc., ANSYS Fluent Theory Guide, Release 2022 R1, Canonsburg, PA, USA, 2022.
[11] A. R. Visconcini, C. M. G. Andrade, and A. M. de S. Costa, Fluid flow simulation of industrial fixed bed mixed-flow grain dryer using k–ω SST turbulence model, International Journal of Agricultural and Biological Engineering, vol. 14, no. 2, pp. 226–230, 2021.
https://doi.org/10.25165/j.ijabe.20211402.5321
[12] S. T. S. Sileshi, A. A. Hassen, and K. D. Adem, Simulation of mixed-mode solar dryer with vertical air distribution channel, Heliyon, vol. 8, no. 11, Nov. 2022, Art. no. e11898. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2022.e11898