Two-Dimensional Gradient-Based Aerodynamic Shape Optimization with Two Geometry Parameterization Techniques using SU2 Code

Trung-Huy Nguyen1, Gia-Long Hoang1, Huy-Duc Nguyen1, Quoc-Bao Nguyen1, Van-Sang Pham1,
1 Hanoi University of Science and Technology, Ha Noi, Vietnam

Main Article Content

Abstract

The paper studies the effect of some shape parameterization techniques on automatic two-dimensional aerodynamic shape optimization using the discrete adjoint method. In this paper, the Hicks-Henne Bump Functions (HHBF) technique and the Free-form Deformation (FFD) control points technique are used to parameterize the shape of the NACA 0012 airfoil. First, this paper makes a full, detailed description of the shape optimization workflow, including Euler equations, geometry parameterization techniques, discrete adjoint method, gradient evaluation, optimization algorithm, and mesh deformation. Second, it explores how shape parameterization techniques are implemented in the optimization problem. Finally, the results are evaluated to compare the efficiency of the mentioned techniques. The results suggest that, in general, both techniques were shown to be equally effective as geometry parameterization methods for the shape optimization problem. However, it appears that the HHBF technique demonstrates better performance with fewer design iterations compared to that of FFD technique. On the other hand, FFD shows stability and a smoother decrease in drag values, while HHBF exhibits greater unsteadiness during the optimization process.

Article Details

References

[1] R. M. Hicks and P. A. Henne, Wing design by numerical optimization, Journal of Aircraft, vol. 15, iss. 7, pp. 407-412, Jul. 1978. https://doi.org/10.2514/3.58379
[2] T. W. Sederberg and S. R. Parry, Free-form deformation of solid geometric models, ACM SIGGRAPH Computer Graphics, vol. 20, iss. 4, pp. 151-160, 1986.
https://doi.org/10.1145/15886.15903
[3] D. Masters, N. J. Taylor, T. Rendall, C. Allen, and D. Poole, A geometric comparison of aerofoil shape parameterisation methods, AIAA Journal, vol. 54, no. 1, Jan. 2016.
https://doi.org/10.2514/6.2016-0558
[4] G. Yang and A. D. Ronch, Aerodynamic shape optimisation of benchmark problems using SU2, in 2018 AIAA/ASCE/AHS/ASC Structures, Structural Dynamics, and Materials Conference, Kissimmee, 8-12 Jan. 2018, Florida, USA, 2018. https://doi.org/10.2514/6.2018-0412
[5] T. Albring, M. Sagebaum, and N. R. Gauger, Efficient aerodynamic design using the discrete adjoint method in SU2, in 17th AIAA/ISSMO Multidisciplinary Analysis and Optimization Conference, Washington D.C, 13-17 Jun. 2015. https://doi.org/10.2514/6.2016-3518
[6] F. Palacios, M. R. Colonno, A. C. Aranake, A. Campos, S. R. Copeland, T. D. Economon, A. K. Lonkar, T. W. Lukaczyk, T. W. R. Taylor, and J. J. Alonso, Stanford University Unstructured (SU2): An open-source integrated computational environment for multi-physics simulation and design, in 51st AIAA Aerospace Sciences Meeting Conference, including the New Horizons Forum and Aerospace Exposition, Grapevine (Dallas/Ft. Worth Region), Texas, January 2013. [Online]. Available: https://arc.aiaa.org/doi/10.2514/6.2013-287
[7] SU2 – Multiphysics simulation and design software, governing equations in SU2, Jun. 23, 2023. [Online]. Available: https://su2code.github.io/docs_v7/Theory/
[8] D. Kraft, A software package for sequential quadratic programming, Tech. Rep. DFVLR-FB 88-28, DLR German Aerospace Center - Institute for Flight Mechanics, Koln, Germany, 1988.
[9] A. J. Joshy and J. T. Hwang, PySLSQP: a transparent Python package for the SLSQP optimization algorithm modernized with utilities for visualization and postprocessing, The Journal of Open-Source Software, vol. 9, no. 103, Nov. 2024, https://doi.org/10.21105/joss.07246
[10] R. P. Dwight, Robust mesh deformation using the linear elasticity equations, in Computational Fluid Dynamics 2006, Springer, pp. 401-406, Jan. 2009.
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-92779-2_62
[11] K. Stein, T. Tezduyar, and R. Benney, Mesh moving techniques for fluid-structure interactions with large displacements, Journal of Applied Mechanics, vol. 70, pp. 58-63, Jan. 2003.
https://doi.org/10.1115/1.1530635