A Mixed-Integer Quadratically Constrained Programming Model for Network Reconfiguration in Power Distribution Systems with Distributed Generation and Shunt Capacitors

Nang Van Pham1, , Quang Duy Do1
1 School of Electrical and Electronic Engineering, Hanoi University of Science and Technology, Hanoi, Vietnam

Main Article Content

Abstract

This paper proposes a formulation based on mixed-integer quadratically constrained programming (MIQCP) for the problem of optimally determining network topology aiming at minimum power loss in electrical distribution grids considering distributed generation and shunt capacitors. The proposed optimization model is derived from the originally nonlinear optimization model by leveraging the modified distribution power flow method that is linear. This optimization model can be effectively solved by standard commercial solvers such as CPLEX. Then, the MIQCP-based formulation is verified on an IEEE 33-bus distribution network and a 190-bus real distribution network in Luc Ngan district, Bac Giang province, Vietnam, in 2021. The effects of the load power level on optimal solutions are analyzed in detail. Furthermore, results of power flow analysis achieved from the modified distribution power flow approach are compared to those from solving nonlinear equations of power flow using the power summation method that gives exact solutions.

Article Details

References

[1] Z. Tian, W. Wu, B. Zhang, and A. Bose, Mixed‐integer
second‐order cone programing model for VAR
optimisation and network reconfiguration in active
distribution networks, IET Generation, Transmission
& Distribution, vol. 10, no. 8, pp. 1938-1946,
May 2016,
https://doi.org/10.1049/iet-gtd.2015.1228.
[2] C. Lee, C. Liu, S. Mehrotra, and Z. Bie, Robust
distribution network reconfiguration, IEEE Trans.
Smart Grid, vol. 6, no. 2, pp. 836-842, Mar. 2015,
https://doi.org/10.1109/TSG.2014.2375160.
[3] J. Zhan, W. Liu, C. Y. Chung, and J. Yang, Switch
opening and exchange method for stochastic
distribution network reconfiguration, IEEE Trans.
Smart Grid, vol. 11, no. 4, pp. 2995-3007, Jul. 2020,
https://doi.org/10.1109/TSG.2020.2974922.
[4] V. Farahani, B. Vahidi, and H. A. Abyaneh,
Reconfiguration and capacitor placement
simultaneously for energy loss reduction based on an
improved reconfiguration method, IEEE Trans. Power
Syst., vol. 27, no. 2, pp. 587-595, May 2012,
https://doi.org/10.1109/TPWRS.2011.2167688.
[5] S. Chen, W. Hu, and Z. Chen, Comprehensive cost
minimization in distribution networks using
segmented-time feeder reconfiguration and reactive
power control of distributed generators, IEEE Trans.
Power Syst., vol. 31, no. 2, pp. 983-993, Mar. 2016,
https://doi.org/10.1109/TPWRS.2015.2419716.
[6] Y. Wang, Y. Xu, J. Li, J. He, and X. Wang, On the
radiality constraints for distribution system restoration
and reconfiguration problems, IEEE Trans. Power
Syst., vol. 35, no. 4, pp. 3294-3296, Jul. 2020,
https://doi.org/10.1109/TPWRS.2020.2991356.
[7] Z. Yang, K. Xie, J. Yu, H. Zhong, N. Zhang, and Q. X.
Xia, A general formulation of linear power flow
models: basic theory and error analysis, IEEE Trans.
Power Syst., vol. 34, no. 2, pp. 1315-1324, Mar. 2019,
https://doi.org/10.1109/TPWRS.2018.2871182.
[8] J. Yang, N. Zhang, C. Kang, and Q. Xia, A state-
independent linear power flow model with accurate
estimation of voltage magnitude, IEEE Trans. Power
Syst., vol. 32, no. 5, pp. 3607-3617, Sep. 2017,
https://doi.org/10.1109/TPWRS.2016.2638923.
[9] L. Bai, J. Wang, C. Wang, C. Chen, and F. Li,
Distribution locational marginal pricing (DLMP) for
congestion management and voltage support, IEEE
Trans. Power Syst., vol. 33, no. 4, pp. 4061-4073, Jul.
2018,
https://doi.org/ 10.1109/TPWRS.2017.2767632.
[10] J. A. Taylor and F. S. Hover, Convex models of
distribution system reconfiguration, IEEE Trans.
Power Syst., vol. 27, no. 3, pp. 1407-1413, Aug. 2012,
https://doi.org/10.1109/TPWRS.2012.2184307.
[11] T. Yang, Y. Guo, L. Deng, H. Sun, and W. Wu, A
linear branch flow model for radial distribution
networks and its application to reactive power
optimization and network reconfiguration, IEEE
Trans. Smart Grid, vol. 12, no. 3, pp. 2027-2036,
May 2021,
https://doi.org/10.1109/TSG.2020.3039984.
[12] P. N. Van and D. Q. Duy, Different linear power flow
models for radial power distribution grids: a
comparison, TNT Journal of Science and Technology,
vol. 226, no. 15, pp. 12-19, Aug. 2021,
https://doi.org/10.34238/tnu-jst.4665.
[13] GAMS.
[14] S. H. Dolatabadi, M. Ghorbanian, P. Siano, and N. D.
Hatziargyriou, An enhanced IEEE 33 bus benchmark
test system for distribution system studies, IEEE
Trans. Power Syst., vol. 36, no. 3, pp. 2565-2572,
May 2021,
https://doi.org/10.1109/TPWRS.2020.3038030.
[15] R. D. Zimmerman, C. E. Murillo-Sanchez, and R. J.
Thomas, MATPOWER: Steady-state operations,
planning, and analysis tools for power systems
research and education, IEEE Trans. Power Syst., vol.
26, no. 1, pp. 12-19, Feb. 2011,
https://doi.org/ 10.1109/TPWRS.2010.2051168.