Blockchain-Enhanced Chain of Custody with Deep Learning Tampering Detection for Digital Forensics

Xuan Hung Truong1,2, , The Dung Luong2, Anh Tu Tran2
1 Cyber Security and High-Tech Crime Prevention Department, Ministry of Public Security, Ha Noi, Vietnam
2 Academy of Cryptography Techniques, Ha Noi, Vietnam

Main Article Content

Abstract

The preservation of digital evidence integrity currently faces critical challenges, notably manual chain-of-custody errors ranging from 15-20%, the proliferation of sophisticated tampering techniques, and inherent scalability limitations. To address these issues, this paper presents an integrated framework that synergistically combines blockchain-based immutable custody chains, dual-branch convolutional neural networks for tampering detection, and hybrid consensus mechanisms. Through systematic ablation studies, we demonstrate that the proposed smart contract automation effectively mitigates manual custody errors, ensuring a tamper-evident and immutable custody record. Furthermore, our dual-branch architecture, enhanced with adaptive fusion (α =0.6), attains a 98.5% tampering detection accuracy—representing a 5.3% improvement over single-branch baselines. Additionally, the hybrid Proof-of-Authority and Byzantine Fault Tolerant consensus mechanism delivers a throughput of 10,000 transactions per second, marking a 1,429-fold improvement over traditional blockchain implementations. A comprehensive evaluation on the NIST CFReDS, supported by statistical validation (p < 0.001), demonstrates the superiority of our approach over six baseline methods. We further provide a detailed failure analysis, a computational cost breakdown, and validation through simulated forensic scenarios, alongside proposed integration pathways for commercial forensic tools such as EnCase and FTK to facilitate practical adoption. 

Article Details

References

[1] B. Guttman, D. R. White, and T. Walraven, Digital Evidence Preservation: Considerations for Evidence Handlers, no. 8354, 2022. https://doi.org/10.6028/NIST.IR.8387
[2] E. Casey, Digital Evidence and Computer Crime: Forensic Science, Computers, and the Internet, 2011.
[3] N. Tyagi and R. Jain, Dual-Branch Convolutional Framework for Spatial and Frequency-Based Image Forgery Detection, 2025. https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2509.05281
[4] M. AlKhanafseh and O. Surakhi, Evidence Preservation in Digital Forensics: An Approach Using Blockchain and LSTM-Based Steganography, Electronics, vol. 13, no. 18, pp. 3729, 2024. https://doi.org/10.3390/electronics13183729
[5] A. H. Lone and R. N. Mir, A Novel Blockchain-Based Digital Forensics Framework for Preserving Evidence and Enabling Investigation in Industrial Internet of Things, Alexandria Engineering Journal, vol. 86, pp. 631–643, 2024. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aej.2023.12.021
[6] M. Imrankhan, M. Viji, S. Rajamani, T. Gnanaprakash, R. Roshan, and G. Saravanan, Blockchain based digital forensic data for unbreakable trust and security, Proc. 2024 Int. Conf. on System, Computation, Automation and Networking (ICSCAN), pp. 1–6, 2024. https://doi.org/10.1109/ICSCAN62807.2024.10894341
[7] X. Guo, X. Liu, Z. Ren, S. Grosz, K. R. Mopuri, and H. Yin, Hierarchical fine-grained image forgery detection and localization, IEEE Transactions on Information Forensics and Security, vol. 18, pp. 3151–3166, 2023. https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2303.17111
[8] C. Feng, D. Wu, T. Wu, and G. Pan, An MSDCNN-LSTM framework for video frame deletion forensics, Multimedia Tools and Applications, vol. 83, pp. 72745–72764, 2024. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11042-024-18324-7
[9] S. Nakamoto, Bitcoin: A Peer-to-Peer Electronic Cash System, 2008. [Online] https://bitcoin.org/bitcoin.pdf
[10] National Institute of Standards and Technology, Computer Forensic Reference Data Sets (CFReDS). [Online] https://cfreds-archive.nist.gov/
[11] K. I. Ponte Cuevas and A. A. Huaman Aguirre, Blockchain as a tool to improve chain of custody procedures in digital forensics: A systematic review, Proc. 23rd LACCEI Int. Multi-Conf. Eng., Educ., Technol. 2025. https://doi.org/10.18687/LACCEI2025.1.1.321
[12] T. X. Hung, L. T. Dung, and T. A. Tu, A Blockchainbased chain of custody for digital evidence: Design and evaluation, Journal of Science and Technology on Information Security, vol. 3, no. 26, pp. 25–38, 2025. https://isj.vn/index.php/journal_STIS/article/view/1167
[13] O. S. Igonor, M. B. Amin, and S. Garg, The application of blockchain technology in the field of digital forensics: A literature review, Blockchains, vol. 3, no. 1, pp. 5, 2025. https://doi.org/10.3390/blockchains3010005
[14] T. Nargis, A. C. Thomas, R. R. Rao, R. Dsouza, R. Dsouza, and S. S M, Cyber forensic evidence protection system using blockchain technology, pp. 614–619, 2025. https://doi.org/10.1109/ICOEI65986.2025.11013602
[15] R. El-Kady, Leveraging AI and machine learning for digital forensics, Quantum AI and its Applications in Blockchain Technology, pp. 215–250, 2024. https://doi.org/10.4018/979-8-3373-1657-4.ch011
[16] S. Darwish, M. Abu-Deif, and S. Elkaffas, Blockchain for video watermarking: An enhanced copyright protection approach for video forensics based on perceptual hash function, PLOS ONE, vol. 19, no. 10, pp. e0312345, 2024. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0308451