A Hybrid Dimensionality Reduction and Quantum Support Vector Machine for Breast Cancer Diagnosis
Main Article Content
Abstract
Quantum Support Vector Machines (QSVMs) have recently emerged as a promising approach for biomedical classification tasks. However, their practical deployment remains constrained by limited qubit availability and sensitivity to high-dimensional feature spaces. This study proposes a hybrid framework integrating Pearson correlation–based feature selection and Principal Component Analysis (PCA) with QSVM for breast cancer diagnosis. First, Pearson correlation analysis is employed to remove redundant and weakly relevant features. Subsequently, PCA projects the selected attributes into a compact subspace while preserving most of the original data variance. This dimensionality reduction strategy decreases the number of qubits required for quantum encoding and improves computational efficiency. Experiments conducted on the Wisconsin Diagnostic Breast Cancer (WDBC) dataset demonstrate that the proposed hybrid QSVM achieves 98% classification accuracy, outperforming or matching existing classical and quantum-based approaches. The results confirm that combining classical preprocessing techniques with quantum classifiers provides a robust and resource-efficient solution for biomedical data analysis.
Keywords
Quantum Support Vector Machine, Feature Selection, Principal Component Analysis, Breast Cancer Diagnosis, Quantum Machine Learning
Article Details

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
References
[2] L. A. Torre et al., Global cancer incidence and mortality rates and trends--An update, Cancer Epidemiol. Biomarkers Prev., vol. 25, no. 1, pp. 16-27, Jan. 2016.
[3] O. D. Balogun and S. C. Formenti, Locally advanced breast cancer--Strategies for developing nations, Front. Oncol., vol. 5, pp. 89, 2015.
[4] Y. Gujju, A. M., and R. R., Quantum machine learning on near-term quantum devices: current state of supervised and unsupervised techniques for real-world applications, arXiv preprint arXiv:2307.00908, 2023.
[5] R. Zhang et al., Quantum support vector machine based on regularized Newton method, Neural Netw., vol. 151, pp. 376-384, 2022.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neunet.2022.03.043
[6] M. Schuld, S. Ryan, and J. M. Johannes, Effect of data encoding on the expressive power of variational quantum-machine-learning models, Phys. Rev. A, vol. 103, no. 3, pp. 032430, Mar. 2021.
https://doi.org/10.1103/physreva.103.032430
[7] J. E. Park et al., Practical application improvement to quantum SVM: theory to practice, arXiv preprint arXiv:2012.07725, 2020.
[8] S. Vashisth, I. Dhall, and G. Aggarwal, Design and analysis of quantum powered support vector machines for malignant breast cancer diagnosis, J. Intell. Syst., vol. 30, no. 1, pp. XX-XX, 2020. https://doi.org/10.1515/jisys-2020-0089
[9] V. Premanand, S. M. B. Snavya, S. Srinivas, and S. Reddy, Quantum machine learning for breast cancer detection: a comparative study with conventional machine learning methods, Indian J. Nat. Sci., vol. 14, no. 78, pp. 57728-57733, Jun. 2023.
[10] E. Akpinar, S. M. N. Islam, and M. Oduncuoglu, Evaluating the impact of different quantum kernels on the classification performance of support vector machine algorithm: a medical dataset application, arXiv preprint arXiv:2407.09930, Jul. 2024. [Online] Available: https://arxiv.org/abs/2407.09930. Accessed on: Feb. 27, 2026.
[11] Breast cancer Wisconsin (diagnostic) dataset, UCI Machine Learning Repository, 1995. [Online] Available: https://archive.ics.uci.edu/dataset/17/breast+cancer+wisconsin+diagnostic. Accessed on: Feb. 27, 2026.
[12] Breast cancer database, University of Wisconsin-Madison, 1995. [Online] Available: https://pages.cs.wisc.edu/~olvi/uwmp/cancer.html. Accessed on: Feb. 27, 2026.
[13] Qiskit machine learning documentation, Qiskit Community, 2024. [Online] Available: https://qiskit-community.github.io/qiskit-machine-learning/. Accessed on: Feb. 27, 2026.
[14] G. Aleksandrowicz et al., Qiskit: an open-source framework for quantum computing, 2019, pp. 55-63.
[15] S. Ibrahim, S. Nazir, and S. A. Velastin, Feature selection using correlation analysis and principal component analysis for accurate breast cancer diagnosis, J. Imaging, vol. 7, no. 11, pp. 225, Oct. 2021. https://doi.org/10.3390/jimaging7110225