Fundamental Experiments on Stopping Control of a Scaled Model Propeller Aircraft Using Double-Fan Propulsion System
Main Article Content
Abstract
The motion of ships and aircraft is governed by inertia and hydrodynamic or aerodynamic forces, so they do not stop immediately even when reverse thrust is applied. Consequently, operations such as maneuvering in harbors and landing require control that can decelerate and stop accurately near a target position, yet full-scale testing can be costly and constrained by safety. This study uses a small wheeled model equipped with two coaxial propellers forming an independently actuated doublefan propulsion system and examines stopping control experimentally. Position is estimated from an overhead camera by detecting a red marker on the vehicle and computing its centroid. Manual control, proportional position control, fixed reversethrust commands, and reference-velocity-based control using velocity feedback were compared. In Experiment 1, fixed reversecommand levels were varied to characterize stopping behavior. In Experiment 2, a single operator controlled the forward thruster while position-based reverse thrust was applied automatically. In Experiment 3, a reference velocity profile obtained from successful manual runs was used for velocity-based control. The results show that fixed reverse thrust can change stopping accuracy and trajectory dispersion depending on the command level, while the reference-velocity-based controller reduced the average stopping-position overshoot from approximately 9 mm to 3 mm under the tested conditions. The contribution of this study is not a new derivative-control law, but an experimental characterization of independently actuated forward/reverse fan control and the application of a reference-velocity-based stopping strategy to this specific double-fan platform. The results are limited to the tested small-scale model and are not intended as a quantitative prediction of full-scale aircraft behavior.
Keywords
Double-fan propulsion, reference velocity, reverse thrust, stopping control, velocity feedback.
Article Details
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
References
https://doi.org/10.1002/9781119994138
[2] M. Kondo, Aircraft Motion and Control. Tokyo, Japan: Sangyo Tosho, 1985.
[3] Ministry of Land, Infrastructure, Transport and Tourism (MLIT), Roadmap toward practical use of autonomous merchant ships, Aug. 2018. [In Japanese].
https://www.mlit.go.jp/common/001237409.pdf
[4] International Maritime Organization (IMO), Interim guidelines for MASS trials, MSC.1/Circ. 1604, 2019.[5] V. Bertram, Autonomous ships, in Proceedings of the 15th International Conference on Computer Applications and Information Technology in the Maritime Industries. (COMPIT), 2016, pp. 10–21.
[6] K. Hasegawa, Trends and future outlook for maritime autonomous surface ships (MASS), KANRIN, vol. 83, pp. 1–8, 2019. [In Japanese].
[7] K. Terashima, Present status and future prospects of autonomous ship technology, Koukai (J. Japan Inst. Navig.), no. 200, pp. 45–52, 2017. [In Japanese].
[8] K. Shoji, Ship Operation and Safety. Tokyo, Japan: Seizando Shoten, 2014. [In Japanese].
[9] Japan Transport Safety Board, Analysis report on marine accidents: Toward prevention of human-factor accidents, 2021. [In Japanese].
[10] Marine Accident Tribunal of Japan, Marine casualty statistics by type and cause (Reiwa 4), 2023. [In Japanese].
[11] A. M. Rothblum, Human error and marine safety, National Safety Council Congress and Exposition, vol. 2, pp. 1–12, 2000.
[12] A. Otani et al., Analysis of mental models and decision criteria of expert ship operators, J. Japan Inst. Navig., vol. 115, pp. 211–218, 2006. [In Japanese].
[13] J. Fukuto, Research on automatic berthing control of ships, Natl. Maritime Res. Inst. Rep., vol. 30, no. 5, pp. 245–312, 1993. [In Japanese].
[14] K. Hasegawa, Current status and issues in automating berthing and unberthing maneuvers, Koukai, no. 180, pp. 32–38, 2012. [In Japanese].
[15] T. Yamazu et al., Construction of an automatic berthing control system using tugboats, Proc. Japan Soc. Naval Architects Ocean Eng., no. 26, pp. 373–376, 2018. [In Japanese].
[16] H. Sato et al., Fundamental experiments on station-keeping control of a small model using camera feedback, Trans. Soc. Instrum. Control Eng., vol. 52, no. 4, pp. 220–227, 2016. [In Japanese].
[17] Y. Ogawa et al., Maneuvering characteristics and control of ships in the low-speed regime, J. Japan Soc. Naval Architects Ocean Eng., no. 25, pp. 105–115, 2017. [In Japanese].
[18] S. Motoda, Environmental disturbances and nonlinear ship motions during berthing and unberthing, in Proc. 27th Ship Mechanics Symp., 2015. [In Japanese].
[19] S. Kuwahara et al., Development of target detection and automatic collision-avoidance algorithms for ships using deep learning, J. Japan Inst. Navig., vol. 141, pp. 165–173, 2019. [In Japanese].
[20] N. Suda, PID Control. Tokyo, Japan: Asakura Publishing, 1992. [In Japanese].
[21] J. J. Hart and J. L. Devolites, NASA Johnson Space Center, Morpheus: Advancing technologies for human exploration, in Proc. AIAA SPACE 2014 Conf. Expo., San Diego, CA, USA, Aug. 2014,
doi: 10.2514/6.2014-4441.
[22] J. J. Hart and J. L. Devolites, The tailoring of traditional systems engineering for the Morpheus project, in Proc. AIAA SPACE 2013 Conf. Expo., San Diego, CA, USA, 2013.
[23] H. Glauert, Airplane propellers, in Aerodynamic Theory, vol. IV, W. F. Durand, Ed. Berlin, Germany: Springer-Verlag, 1935, pp. 169–360.
[24] B. W. McCormick, Aerodynamics, Aeronautics, and Flight Mechanics, 2nd ed. New York, NY, USA: Wiley, Sep. 1994.
[25] H. Nouri, F. Ravelet, F. Bakir, C. Sarrat, and R. Rey, Design and experimental validation of a ducted counter-rotating axial-flow fans system, Journal of Fluids Engineering, vol. 134, iss. 10, Oct. 2012, Art. no. 104504.
https://doi.org/10.1115/1.4007591